unsorted dependencies

exponentiation
Suppose b R , and n N 1 , then b n := b b b b n  times  , note that b n : N 1 R
exponentiation of a positive number is positive
Suppose that x R > 0 , then x n R > 0
product of two reals of the same sign is positive
Given x , y R , if x , y < 0 or x , y > 0 , then x y = 0
multiplicative inverse
Suppose that x R 0 , then if w R satisfies x w = 1 , then it is said to be the reciprocal or multiplicative inverse of x and we write w = 1 x
Suppose that n N 1 and f : R > 0 R is defined as f ( x ) = x n , then f is strictly increasing.
Suppose that n N 1 and x R > 0 , then x n > 0
(TODO: product of two numbers of the same sign is positive and induction.)
Suppose that a , b , c R , with a < b and c > 0 , then a c < b c
Suppose that a n , b n are two real sequences and that n = 0 a n and n = 0 b n are convergent series, if for each n N , a n < b n , then n = 1
Suppose x , y R with the same sign. Then x < y if and only if 1 y 1 x
binomial
Suppose that x , y R such that x + y 0 and that n N 0 , then
( x + y ) n = k = 0 n ( n k ) x n k y k
TODO

exponential function

exponential
e x := k = 0 x k k ! , note that e x : R R and that x k is exponentiation. We say that e x is the exponential.
e x = lim n ( 1 + x n ) n
TODO
d d x [ e x ] = e x

d d x = lim h 0 e x + h e x h = lim h lim n ( 1 + x + h n ) n lim n ( 1 + x n ) n h = lim h 0 ( lim n ( 1 + x + h n ) n ( 1 + x n ) n h )

Therefore by the binomial theorem...

exponential sum product equality
Suppose x , y R , then e x + y = e x e y
TODO
reciprocal of exponential
1 e x = e x

e 0 = 1 as if we sub in x = 0 e x = n = 0 x n n ! , and we know that 0 0 is defined to be 0 , then e 0 = 1

But at the same time e 0 = e x x which equals e x e x = 1 , so thus 1 e x = e x as needed.

x < 0 ,iff e x < 1
since e x is increasing it's fine (TODO finish)
0 < x < 1 iff ln ( x ) < 0
TODO
exponential is always positive
x R , e x > 0

If x > 0 , then by one of the unordered dependencies we have x n > 0 , then by one of the unorder dependencies about real numbes since 1 n ! > 0 we have x n n ! > 0 n ! = 0 and using x n n ! = n = 0 a n with a i = 0 for i { 0 , , n 1 } and a n = x n n ! and b i = x i i ! the comparison test tells us that 0 < e x

If x < 0 , then x > 0 , and thus by the above argumnet 0 < e x = 1 e x , recall that e x e x = 1 , and we know that e x and 1 are positive so therefore e x > 0 as well, as needed.

If x = 0 , then e x = e 0 = 1

logarithm
Suppose that a , b R , then m = log b ( a ) is a number such that b m = a
natural logarithm
We define ln ( x ) := log e ( x ) and call it the natural logarithm.
r R , r x := e ln ( r ) x
exponentiation inverse
given r R , then the multiplicative inverse of r x is r x
TODO
Suppose that 0 < r < 1 and x R > 0 , then 0 < r x < 1
TODO
Let a , b R > 0 and assume that a < b , then if 0 < r < 1 , then r a > r b
Since a < b , then 0 < b a , and thus