Continuous Implies Bounded
if f is continuous on [ a , b ] , then it is bounded on [ a , b ]
Let B = { p [ a , b ] : f ( x )  is bounded on  [ a , p ] } , note that a B since f ( [ a , a ] ) = { f ( a ) } therefore f ( [ a , b ] ) is bounded.

Suppose that e B and e > a , then f is bounded on [ a , e ] by the definition of B , meaning that for any a < m < e , f is bounded on [ a , m ] so m B , this shows that B is an interval of the form [ a , x ] for x [ a , b ] .

f is continuous at a , then let t R be a throwaway value insofar as to obtain some δ R > 0 so that for all x dom ( f ) = [ a , b ] , we have | x a | < δ implying | f ( x ) f ( a ) | < t .

This shows us that f is bounded on [ a , a + δ ] using our throwaway value of t , therefore a + δ B and as mentioned in the second paragraph, we know [ a , a + δ ] B , this means that B has at least two values, so we can find another element y B such that a < y .

Since R has the least upper bound property then since B is bounded above by b , then we know that s := sup ( B ) B , from the existance of y , then by chaining inequalities we get a < s (todo: define set builder notation) (anything amaller has a point greater def of sup)