Let
, note that
since
therefore is bounded.
Suppose that and , then is bounded on by the definition of , meaning that for any , is bounded on so , this shows that is an interval of the form for .
is continuous at , then let be a throwaway value insofar as to obtain some so that for all , we have implying .
This shows us that is bounded on using our throwaway value of , therefore and as mentioned in the second paragraph, we know , this means that has at least two values, so we can find another element such that .
Since has the least upper bound property then since is bounded above by , then we know that , from the existance of , then by chaining inequalities we get (todo: define set builder notation) (anything amaller has a point greater def of sup)