Note that the integers show that the empty set is not in this family. We'll now prove that it's union equals , so let , therefore is in at least one of the sets included in , since each is a subset of , then we know , for the reverse direction, we can assume that , therefore we know that is either positive, negative or zero, so that , this shows .
To show this family is pairwise disjoint, note that and , which shows us that and .
Given any positive integer, we know it cannot be a negative integer, therefore , thus we know that is pairwise disjoint, which concludes the proof.
a set intersected with a superset is itself
Let be sets such that , then
We start by showing , so consider , so we know that and , therefore we trivially know that , as needed
Now consider the other direction, we need to show that , so consider that , then we want to show that and , which really just simplifies to showing , but we know that , therefore since , we know that finishing the proof
A Set Union a Subset is Itself
Let be sets such that , then
We start by showing , so consider , so we know that or , if we are done, on the other hand if , then since , then as needed.
Supposing that , then we know that is true.
Subset of an Intersection
Suppose that are sets then iff and
Suppose that , suppose , therefore and showing and
Now suppose that and , therefore given , we can see that as needed.
intersection factors from union
Suppose that is an indexed family of sets, and is any set, then
Suppose that , therefore there is some such that , so that and . Since there is some such that then , additionally we had that so that as needed
Now suppose that , therefore and , due to this we have some , such that and thus which by definition shows that
intersection factors from intersection
Suppose that is an indexed family of sets, and is any set, then
Suppose that , therefore for every we have: , so that and . Since it's true for every then , additionally we had that so that as needed
Now suppose that , therefore and , due to this, for every , we know and thus which by definition shows that
Union of Subsets is Still a Subset
Suppose that is a collection of subsets of , then
Let , then for some , since must be a subset of then x is also in . As needed
Intersection of Subsets is Still a Subset
Suppose that is a collection of subsets of , then
Let , then for each , focusing on a single such set since must be a subset of then x is also in . As needed
An Intersection of Supersets is still a Superset
Suppose that is a collection of supersets of , then
Let , suppose that , thus by definition , and since we must deduce , therefore as needed.
Intersection Decreases as It Intersects More Things
Suppose that are families of sets such that , then
Let , then for every . Now consider any , then therefore which shows that as needed.
The Intersection of a Collection of Sets Is a Subset of Any Set Part of the Intersection
Suppose that is a collection of sets, then for any we have: