ΘρϵηΠατπ

Suppose that (An) is a sequence of sets, then we say that An→A iff \left( I \left( A _ n \right) \to I \left( A \right) \right) A sequence (xn)⊆ℝ converges to x if ∀ϵ∈ℝ>0,∃Ninℕ0 st n>N⟹|xn−x|<ϵ Suppose that (fn) is a sequence of functions, then we say it converges pointwise to f if for any x∈dom⁡(f) we have that (fn(x)) converges to \left( f \left( x \right) \right)
Increasing Sequence of Sets
Let (An) be a sequence of sets, then we say that it's increasing when A0⊆A1⊆A2⊆...
Decreasing Sequence of Sets
Let (An) be a sequence of sets, then we say that it's decreasing when A0⊇A1⊇A2⊇...
A Sequence of Sets Increase to Another
Suppose that (An) is an increasing sequence of sets, then we say it increases to A when ⋃n=1∞An=A, and write (An)↗A
A Sequence of Sets Decrease to Another
Suppose that (An) is an decreasing sequence of sets, then we say it decreases to A when ⋃n=1∞An=A, and write (An)↘A
Half Closed Subset of Open for Smaller Value
Suppose that a,b,c∈ℝ such that b<c, then (a,b]⊆(a,c)
Open Sets as an Increasing Sequence of Sets
Let J:={(x,y]⊆ℝ:x,y∈ℝ}, show that there is an increasing sequence of sets that increase to the interval (a,b)

We define the sequence An:=(a,b−1n] for each n∈ℕ1 . We first show that the sequence is increasing, let k∈ℕ1 in, and note that k<k+1, that is 1k>1k+1, therefore (a,b−1k]⊆(a,b−1k+1], so that Ak⊆Ak+1, therefore (An) is increasing.

We now show that ⋃i=1∞An=(a,b). Let x∈⋃i=1∞An, by definition this means that there is some j∈ℕ1 such that x∈Aj, in other words x∈(a,b−1j] since b−1j<b then we know that (a,b−1j]⊆(a,b) (by the above lemma), therefore we know that x∈(a,b) .

We now work on the opposite inclusion, so assume that x∈(a,b), note that x<b, so that b−x>0, and define N:=⌊1b−x⌋+1, note that N>0 then we have the following: 1b−x<N therefore by multiplying each side by 1N and then b−x, we obtain that 1N<b−x.

Now notice that 1N<b−x is equivalent to −1N>x−b which is the same as b−1N>x thus we can also say that x<b−1N<b and we we clearly see that x∈(a,x] therefore we can conclude that x∈(a,b−1N], but (a,b−1N] is exactly AN, so we've shown there is some k∈ℕ1 such that x∈Ak (namely k=N ) therefore by definition x∈⋃i=1∞Ai as needed.